New Traffic? Must Mean Shops at Santa Anita Will Be Wonderful, Right?
This entry was posted on 4/10/2007 11:30 PM and is filed under uncategorized.
I have followed both sides of the decision with interest and read all the opposing arguments which seem to boil down to two things only:
* Traffic issues. Let's be clear... Traffic will be generated by both the third extension of Westfield's mall and the Caruso development. According to Arcadia First, Caruso's development (and puzzlingly only Caruso) will generate millions of extra cars. How can that be? Presumably because the Caruso development will be so much better than the Westfield one that millions of people will want to come and enjoy it -- otherwise, why aren't they coming now? Caruso's development is obviously going to be wonderful! AND Caruso is contributing $10 million to easing traffic - (I have not seen anything much from Westfield as to their contribution towards traffic; just $millions wasted on misrepresentation.)
The we come to...
* Gambling. There is no gambling property planned within the mall so why does Arcadia First continue with this misrepresentation? Gambling is offered within the current racetrack building only and is merely being shifted to its own more private area making the racetrack more suitable for family use. It is therefore not an issue and as such is a complete fabrication.
The benefits from Caruso however are compound -- extra revenue, a wonderful town center, upscale shopping and a beautiful and impressive way to dien outdoors facing our historic landmark, enabling everyone to savour and experience it. We don't have any of these benefits currently and Westfield cannot provide them either.
The alternative is nothing -- it will be some other type of commercial venture with probably consdierably less appeal.
Opportunity is there on a plate -- grab it while you can!
Nicky Hunter -- 91006